Content Summary

Share the Post:

Has the Computer Changed How We Imagine?

I still remember my first day working in an architecture studio. I was handed a blank sheet of paper. No template. No brief. Just space to think, to draw, to begin. That moment marked the true start of architecture for me.

Even now, more than 50 years later, I remember how it felt. Confronting, yes, but also full of possibility. That blank page wasn’t empty; it was alive with potential. The act of working between the hand, the head, the pen, and the paper to form an idea remains, for me, the essence of design.


Drawing as a Way of Thinking

Today, much of our work happens on screens. We rely on digital tools, complex models, and highly resolved imagery. These tools have transformed the way buildings are documented and delivered, bringing accuracy and efficiency that were once impossible.

But I still begin in the same way I always have, with a sketch. A hand-drawn line has a directness that allows ideas to emerge rather than be forced. Drawing is not about presentation. It is a way of thinking, of testing, of discovering relationships before they are fixed.

Precision and Possibility

There is no question that computers have changed the profession. We have gained precision, coordination, and speed. But it is worth asking what may have been diminished in the process. The quiet pause before the first line is drawn. The moment where instinct meets intent. The moment where uncertainty is allowed, and imagination has room to wander.

A comment from Glenn Murcutt has stayed with me over the years. He once said, “My role is not that of a creator; my role is that of a discoverer.” At its best, architecture is not about imposing ideas onto a site or a brief, but about uncovering what a place, a moment, or a way of living is quietly asking for.

Where Ideas Begin

Technology will continue to evolve, and rightly so. Digital tools are now an essential part of practice. But the starting point still matters. The act of sketching slows the process enough to allow thought, judgment, and restraint to enter the conversation.

For me, architecture begins not with certainty, but with curiosity. Not with a screen, but with a blank page and the willingness to listen to what might emerge.

Sign-up to our newsletter

Join our community for design thinking, project insights, industry changes, and team updates.

Read More

Should We Be Designing Houses To Last 100 Years?

How long should a house last? It’s not a question we ask very often, but perhaps we should. In New Zealand, the Building Code states that the main structure of a house is legally required to have a minimum life of 50 years. While different building elements are also assigned

Why Choose An Architect Over A Group Home Builder?

It’s a question I’ve been asking myself a lot recently. For many people, the appeal of a group home builder is obvious. There’s a familiar process, fixed pricing, one point of contact and, at least on the surface, a sense of certainty. It feels simple, and in a world where

Waste, Infrastructure, and the Responsibility of Architecture

We often think of architecture in terms of what we can see. Form, material, proportion, light. The crafted elements that shape how a building is experienced. But some of the most critical systems that shape how our buildings perform are the ones we never see. Wastewater. Stormwater. Energy. They sit